- Caveminds: 7-9 Figure Founder AI Community
- Posts
- Is Your AI Model Half-Baked? Winning Recipes for LLM Success
Is Your AI Model Half-Baked? Winning Recipes for LLM Success
From half-baked ideas to well-done solutions, learn the secret ingredients to AI success.
In today’s edition…
Why Testing Your AI Model Matters More Than You Think
Maximizing LLM Efficiency: The Key Metrics You Need to Know
Optimizing LLMs: A Practical Guide to Enhanced AI Performance
Google’s Got Major AI Updates - Midjourney too.
In today’s piece, we reveal the secret to deploying AI models that truly deliver. From the pitfalls of relying solely on ChatGPT to the power of OpenLLMetry, we'll guide you through enhancing your AI's performance and reliability with expert insights and actionable tips.
Join 9,000+ founders getting actionable golden nuggets that are tailored to make your business more profitable.
TOPIC OF THE WEEK
Mastering LLM Development: Your Recipe for Success in AI
You can meticulously train models, feeding them data like secret spices, but how do you truly know if the AI delivers true value?
Similar anxieties plague businesses developing a large language model (LLM). The generative nature of LLMs makes it hard to measure and evaluate the quality of the outputs they generate.
ℹ️ Why This Matters Today
Well-defined evaluation metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall provide developers with clear feedback on model performance, which allows them to apply a more rigorous, data-driven approach to testing and improving your AI applications.
Without reliable evaluation methods, your LLM could end up serving subpar "dishes" that alienate customers and tarnish your brand.
We recently had a chat with Nir Gazit from Traceloop – a company specializing in LLM observability and testing solutions – to get a more in-depth understanding of this critical issue: the lack of rigorous testing and evaluation in LLM development.
This "trial and error" approach leads to several problems:
Pushing untested LLMs to production risks poor outputs, negative user experiences, and potential harm.
Manual testing often misses deeper complexities, biases, or unintended consequences.
Overreliance on unproven capabilities creates unrealistic expectations and hinders responsible development.
Just taking the output of GPT and asking GPT if it's a good output is just being lazy.
⚒️ Actionable Steps
Nir advocates for backtesting and monitoring as essential good practices, offering these key steps:
Step 1: Use an observability platform
Leverage tools that automate testing, provide objective metrics, and offer actionable feedback on prompt configurations and outputs.
Observability platforms like Traceloop offer features like corner case testing, stress testing, and adversarial testing to identify vulnerabilities and unexpected behaviors. You can connect it with your development and deployment pipelines for seamless integration into your existing processes.
Step 2: Define success metrics
Here’s a detailed list of metrics you should consider when starting with LLM observability:
Latency: Basically, how fast the AI responds to a request. For anything that needs to work in real-time, like chatbots, faster is better. If you're juggling different AI models, comparing their speeds can help you pick the best one.
Throughput: This tells you how many requests your AI can handle in a set amount of time. How many questions can it answer in a set time? If you're hitting the limits of what your AI can do, it might be time to ask for a higher limit or manage how much it's used better.
Error Rate: Keep track of how often the AI gets things wrong. This helps you figure out how reliable it is and when you might need to step in to make improvements.
Token Usage: Tokens are like the words and bits of words the AI juggles when it's thinking. Tracking this helps you manage costs, as more complex thoughts can mean higher bills.
Response-Time-to-Prompt-Token Ratio - This one's a bit more technical, but think about the balance between how much your AI needs to "think" (how many tokens it uses) and how quickly it delivers an answer. Odd patterns here could hint at deeper issues, like if your prompts are too vague or too complicated.
Understanding these metrics can help you get the most out of your AI, ensuring it's fast, reliable, and cost-effective for your business needs.
Step 3: Gather Diverse Data
Don't just use your existing data: Backtest and monitor your LLM on data representative of your target audience and use cases. Consider:
Real-world data
Diversity of demographics and viewpoints
Edge cases that might challenge the LLM and expose potential biases or vulnerabilities
🏆 Golden Nuggets
LLMs aren't magic solutions. They have limitations in factual accuracy, reasoning, and context-sensitivity.
Don't use an LLM to evaluate another LLM's output. This creates a circular validation loop that perpetuates issues.
Regularly backtest and monitor your LLM to adapt to changes in data, user behavior, and societal norms.
Secret Sauce of AI Success: Navigating the Complexities of LLM Deployment
OpenTelemetry is the secret ingredient that enables different parts of your model to report back on how they're doing in real time.
It is a set of tools, APIs, and SDKs that work together to collect, generate, and manage telemetry data (like metrics, logs, and traces) from software applications and services.
This classic engineering concept was wrapped and adapted for LLMs, calling it OpenLLMetry.
🏆 Why Leverage OpenLLMetry for LLM Observability?
OpenLLMetry is a critical foundation part of your observability stack.
It's designed to easily integrate with a wide array of observability and analysis tools, so it can collect data on how your AI model perform in diverse environments, all in one place.
This uniformity means that no matter what your tech stack looks like, you can use the same approach to collect and analyze data – making life much easier for developers and operators.
💡 Best Use Cases
OpenLLMetry, with its ability to collect, process, and distribute LLM telemetry data (metrics, logs, and traces) across systems, is a powerful tool for enhancing observability and operational efficiency in various business contexts.
Here are some of the best business use cases for leveraging OpenLLMetry:
1. Performance Monitoring and Optimization
Use Case: Real-time tracking of application performance, including response times, system throughput, and error rates.
Benefit: Identifies bottlenecks and performance issues, enabling businesses to optimize applications for better user experiences and operational efficiency.
2. Cost Management and Resource Optimization
Use Case: Monitoring resource usage across cloud services and applications to understand and control operational costs.
Benefit: Helps businesses allocate resources more efficiently, reduce waste, and plan for scaling based on actual usage data, leading to significant cost savings.
3. Debugging and Troubleshooting
Use Case: Using traces and logs to pinpoint the root causes of errors or failures in software applications.
Benefit: Speeds up the resolution of issues, minimizes downtime, and improves reliability, directly impacting customer satisfaction and trust.
4. Security Monitoring and Anomaly Detection
Use Case: Analyzing log data to detect unusual patterns that could indicate security breaches or malicious activities.
Benefit: Enhances the security posture of businesses by enabling rapid detection and response to potential threats, protecting sensitive data and customer information.
CAVEMINDS’ CURATION
What’s wrong with ChatGPT?
There’s a tricky issue with using ChatGPT and similar AI models: they're not great at checking their own work.
The way it was fine-tuned… what happens is that if you ask GPT if something is okay or if something is wrong, it will always find problems.
This is because its main job is to predict and generate text that sounds believable based on what it's learned from a huge amount of data, not to judge the truthfulness or accuracy of its responses.
Why can't an LLM just check itself?
Well, for one, it’s not built for it. LLMs generate text based on patterns they see in data, not on hard facts.
So, when it tries to confirm if its previous response was correct, it's essentially guessing again, not truly verifying. The way an AI model is trained doesn’t include self-check
Then there’s also the AI hallucination problem. If you ask it to verify something it made up, it might just double down, giving you a confident but incorrect validation.
“People need to study and understand more about the limitations of what large language models like GPT can or can’t do today. It's wrong more times than it's right, and you need to know exactly how to use it. You can't expect it to solve all of your problems. You can just throw more tokens and expect things to just work.”
What are some other challenges that you should avoid if you are building an LLM?
⚒️ Actionable Steps
Tip #1: Don’t Rely on ChatGPT for Everything
Encourage your dev team to research beyond mainstream LLMs like ChatGPT. There's a whole universe of AI models out there that might better suit your specific needs or offer unique advantages.
I would say that people don't explore enough other models and other ways to use other LLMs.
Start with a team brainstorming session to uncover and evaluate alternative LLMs that might offer distinct advantages for your projects.
Tip #2: Consider Open Source and Alternative Providers
Investigate open-source LLMs and other lesser-known models (Nir suggests Cohere or Anthropic). These alternatives may offer models with different strengths, such as better handling of large token windows or specialized ranking models.
Consider allocating a budget for testing these models on small-scale projects to identify ones that best meet your needs.
Tip #3: Experiment with Token Windows and Attention Capabilities
Don't assume larger token windows automatically mean better performance. Experiment with how different models manage extensive contexts and understand their limitations. This will help you craft prompts and structure data that enhances the effectiveness of the LLMs in your applications.
“I haven't seen GPT or even anthropic doing a really good job in using large token windows. They still need to work on that a bit as engineers before we can actually take advantage of such a large context window.”
Test how different models manage large token windows to find the best fit for applications needing extensive context. Understand the limitations of each model's attention mechanism, especially for large inputs.
Bard is officially rebranded to Gemini, marking the end of an era.
Here’s the scoop on what makes Gemini Ultra a game-changer:
You can opt out of training data when signing up
You'll have the freedom to pick your preferred model, much like choosing between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
Imagen 2-generated images within Gemini Ultra come with an invisible digital watermark.
It’s better at handling tasks like coding, logical puzzles, and following intricate instructions.
The new Google Gemini App has landed on Google Play and the App Store (only available in the US for now).
Say “Hey Google” to pull in data from Google Flights, Hotels, Maps, Workspace, and YouTube right into your Gemini conversations on Android.
It’s priced at $20 a month like ChatGPT’s offer, but with a 2-month free trial to sweeten the deal.
Midjourney just launched an alpha test of their new website for select users.
If you've already created 1000+ images with them, you're in luck! You can help them test and refine their new website.
Expect things to change quickly as they gather feedback and improve the platform. Don't worry if you can't join yet - mobile access is coming soon!
That’s all for today’s edition!
Continue Reading
We appreciate all of your votes. We would love to read your comments as well! Don't be shy, give us your thoughts, we promise we won't hunt you down. 😉
🌄 CaveTime is Over! 🌄
Thanks for reading, and until next time. Stay primal!
Reply